• paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    If weight isn’t an issue, then it makes sense to use a system that only costs a fraction of a hydrogen-powered setup.

    Trains don’t need to fly. Just pack them full of batteries or - arguably even better - just electrify the line wherever possible.

    That’s just not an option for planes, so hydrogen remains a potentially viable approach.

    • a_spooky_specter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same goes for large container ships. It won’t make sense to use batteries unless there are significant breakthroughs in capacity technology.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the advantages of hydrogen is that tanks and fuel cells can withstand a large number of “charging cycles” much better than batteries. Additionally, for ships, the amount of energy needed to move is so enormous that I fear we’ll have a hard time creating batteries that are feasible for long-distance shipping.

        For short distance ferrying (including large, car carrying ferries) on the other hand, Norway has already implemented quite a few electric stretches. The major issue there is building the infrastructure to charge the ferries.