• Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    We were talking about federated software, based on a shared protocol but with many different implementations vs centralized software (as in run by one entity, not as in non-distributed).

    Your pedanticts are what the whole discussion was about. So your pedantics aren’t valid.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I get where you are coming from but you clearly equated email to software which is wrong. It’s not a software. The rest of your points are valid. No need to get pissy.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And if eMail (the whole system) wasn’t federated but instead would be run by a single company, then it would be: yes, a single software implementation.

        Pro tip: any comment that begins with “to be pedantic” usually adds nothing to the discussion and has the sole purpouse to make the pedant feel superior over everyone else. It’s a good way to annoy everyone else in the discussion.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You seriously need to pull your head out your ass.

          Email is not a software. It’s a horrible example. It’s no different than saying SNMP is software. It’s fundamentally wrong.

          Now I was nice. Yes it was stupid to bring up but not everyone is in IT so not everyone would know your example of email as a software is wrong. That is why I, quite nicely, brought it up. Not to hate simply it’s a bad example and it still is.

          Yet here you are doubling down on aggressive bullshit for being politely advised your example was shit.