If you were to make a wireless shower head, would it have hydrogen molecules and suck in the oxygen from the air to create water? Would you have to recharge it with hydrogen?

  • whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Was this a thought you had in the shower, or a thought you had about showers?

    Also, the pipe carrying water to the showerhead isn’t a wire or cord, and therefore every showerhead is wireless.

  • editilly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ibwas about to dislike (not downvote) this one, but after a second of thought, this is great. Because it doesn’t make practical sense, but at least isn’t something based in a fault of understanding of the real world, so good job

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is not your original shower thought, this is the same shower thought had by Max Pruss, captain of the LZ 129 Hindenburg.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would just have a non-removable refillable dihydrogen monoxide battery like all modern wireless devices.

      • djquadratic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        i think you’re on the cusp on creating the next fad in the wellness industry - find a way to legally call it that and suddenly its flying off the shelves. “it’s so safe you can DRINK it!”

  • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    My wireless shower head does’t use hydrogen, it just uses a hose to supply the water. No wires though.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The act of oxygenating hydrogen is massively volatile and releases a bunch of energy. You could power a large truck with the energy that would be produced when you make barely a trickle of water.

  • Sylver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    As others have mentioned, pure hydrogen and pure oxygen are both quite flammable. It would be very expensive to extract/filter only the oxygen out of the air while staying portable, but I think we may need to go for a tank-storage design anyways.

    I think you’re better off using hydrogen peroxide from a tank (maybe even a backpack?) and breaking that down into water and oxygen (o2)

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pure Hydrogen peroxide is very reactive. It’d explode or burn in contact with organic molecules, such as skin.

      Solution at relatively low concentration are still hazardous and toxic.

      I would avoid playing with it

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hidrogen peroxide? That means your wireless shower will be heavier than if it’s actually store plain old water instead.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oxygen itself isn’t flammable actually, but it makes other things more so.

  • deejay4am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It might not be a good idea to create a device that sucks all the oxygen out of an enclosed space meant for a human during operation 💀

  • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have engineered a solution for exactly this, believe it or not.

    The shower system consists of carbon doped ferrous material coated with a zinc passivation agent. There is a flow control subsystem made of a Cu-Zn alloy which also causes aerosolization of the hydrogen-oxygen payload. The hydrogen-oxygen mixture is pre-processed in a large volume nitrogen container, and precipitated down to the shower system using a combination of thermal effects and manipulation of ambient pressure.

    Works really well, only limitation is the amount of precipitate available.

    In other words, it’s a metal rain bucket with a faucet.

  • wasney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I imagine a wireless shower head could just be a squirt gun type deal with a shower head on the end.

    Or, to stay close to your example, why not two canisters, Hydrogen and Oxygen. Then you’re not sucking all the oxygen in the room.