Just because you don’t believe in rights doesn’t mean an argument is flat. Rights movements pave way for social acceptance and improve the treatment of victims.
i think you are misunderstanding me. if i said i don’t believe in god, and you argue that the bible demands i be vegan, you can see how i would say “right. but i don’t believe in the bible.” the same thing here.
Just because you don’t believe in rights doesn’t mean an argument is flat. Rights movements pave way for social acceptance and improve the treatment of victims.
if rights are a fiction, then appealing to them is meaningless.
All social constructs aren’t material based, it doesn’t make them meaningless
i don’t believe in rights. so appealing to rights, when trying to convince me of your moral position, is absurd.
Rights movements pave more than rights. They encourage people to be more respectful, mindful, and kind.
i think you are misunderstanding me. if i said i don’t believe in god, and you argue that the bible demands i be vegan, you can see how i would say “right. but i don’t believe in the bible.” the same thing here.