A year ago I set up Ubuntu server with 3 ZFS pools on my server, normally I don’t make copies of very large files but today I was making a copy of a ~30GB directory and I saw in rsync that the transfer doesn’t exceed 3mb/s (cp is also very slow).

What is the best file system that “just works”? I’m thinking of migrating everything to ext4

EDIT: I really like the automatic pool recovery feature in ZFS, has saved me from 1 hard drive failure so far

  • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
    52·
    1 year ago

    Yes and BTRFS, unlike Ext4, will not go corrupt on the first power outage of slight hardware failure.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      Corruption on power only regularly happened to me on xfs a few years ago. That made me swear to never use that fs ever again. Never seen it on my ext4fs systems which are all I have for years in multiple computers.

      • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        I’m confused with your answer. BTRFS is good and reliable. Ext4 gets fucked at the slightest issue.

        • Eideen@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.

          For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

          • Atemu@lemmy.mlEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Ext4 does not have CoW.

            That’s the only true part of this comment.

            As for everything else:

            Ext4 uses journaling to ensure consistency.

            btrfs’ CoW makes it resistant to that issue by its nature; writes go elsewhere anyways, so you can delay the “commit” until everything is truly written and only then update the metadata (using a similar scheme again).

            Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journaling_file_system.

          • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
            0·
            1 year ago

            For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

            This is where theory and practice diverge and I bet a lot of people here will essentially have the same experience I have. I will never run an Ext filesystem again, not ever as I got burned multiple times both at home/homelab and at the datacenter with Ext shenanigans. BTRFS, ZFS, XFS all far superior and more reliable.