Former President Barack Obama said a way forward for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is only possible if people acknowledge the “complexity” of the situation.

“If there’s any chance of us being able to act constructively to do something, it will require an admission of complexity and maintaining what on the surface may seem contradictory ideas that what Hamas did was horrific, and there’s no justification for it. And … that the occupation and what’s happening to Palestinians is unbearable,” Obama said in an interview on the podcast “Pod Save America.”

The former president’s comments come as the Israeli military focuses its offensive against Hamas in Gaza City and northern parts of the enclave.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the answer and is being downvoted with no better suggestions. If you don’t have solutions and only criticism, you’re part of the problem.

    • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Criticism, constructively made, helps avoid bad ideas, and makes good ones better. But you don’t always know the better way when you see a bad one— I don’t need to know how to build a boat to know a screen door won’t float.

      Part of the problem is one side having a desire for autonomy, and limited, at best sense of self-determination. Robbing them and the state they have grievance with of both their autonomies and capacities for self-determination doesn’t seem like a good answer to the problems they both have.

      • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why you remove all the sides. Corporations already act without boundaries. They actually benefit from country boundaries ie: manufactured in China for cheap and sold in America for massive profit. Corporate interest is what is against no country boundries.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. But downvotes to a legitimate solution without criticism or suggestions is pointless and contributes nothing to the discussion. I don’t care if you even suggest nuking the entire area. Just own it and defend your opinion.

        • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh… I think I might care about somebody suggesting nuking the entire area. Not all ideas are created equal, and not all ideas are worth expressing.

          • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, we absolutely do not nuke the area. That’s what Buttholeyahu wants to do. You know the corrupt leader of Israel. What about America, yeah there’s a shitload of corruption here too and it’s still wrong.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another thought that I had was having international governing bodies get together and force Israel to pay for the relocation, education, housing, and UBI for every single Palestinian citizen for the remainder of their lives if they would agree to peaceful relocation to another host country. This is a much less preferable idea to the previously mentioned one, but it seemed like a potentially feasible one.

      • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Forced migration, which this would be, is a bad idea, as has been born out repeatedly through history.

        • if it’s to many countries, it splinters communities.
        • if it’s to just one country, few are open to taking even small numbers of people in, let alone five and a half million.
        • if one was open to it, none have the infrastructure in place to receive so many people.
        • people get attached to land, and the idea of it.

        To that last point, that land is not interchangeable, and any assumption that it is is remaining ignorant of some of the desires of the parties involved.

        I could go on, but I don’t think that would add to discourse. This is a hard problem, renewed with every moment of violence. I don’t believe we should expect any of the grievances each side has stacked up to be let go of without honouring their non-violent desires.

    • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @TokenBoomer

      If you think you can reduce the solution to this problem (or even a proper description of the problem itself) into a quick reply on a web forum, you’re part of the problem.

      Honestly, everyone I’ve seen weigh in on this has fucked it up, on all sides, at all times, going all the way back.

      Maybe a bunch of armchair geniuses should stay out of it, unless they’re willing to drop what they’re doing and go over there to help. Meddling from external parties is part of how this got so fucked up (over and over and over).

      • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is asshole leaders are being petty little brats. There is a solution, but both parties involved are being selfish assholes and the citizens end up dying and suffering. There are easy solutions to everything when you remove the angry assholes.

      • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A child knows right from wrong until they are corrupted by an adult. The answer is easy. The evil ones who benefit are making it hard.