• BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not necessarily no, and especially here, the kid had no previous issues with the police (he had no criminal record).
    He was definitely an idiot for driving recklessly (and without a license I believe), and being arrested by the police for that is fair.
    But then for some reason he got held at gunpoint by two angry and racist cops. I assume he got scared and tried to drive off (also a somewhat fair reaction especially coming from a teenager), then he got shot and killed. If he got away with it and ran over someone while fleeing, he also should have gotten served a prison sentence or similar, but definitely not death. As for the hypothetical 40 years old, he could get distracted one day and run over someone as well, and that doesn’t warrant death penalty either.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree with your post here so have an upvote. I think I’m realizing Lemmy is the same clone of reddit where virtue signaling is more interesting than having a Convo. At least you tried so I appreciate that

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not virtue signaling to downvote someone who is acting reprehensibly.

        If your immediate instinct is “these 30 people are virtue signaling,” maybe you should reconsider your position. Maybe shooting someone who is fleeing is actually wrong and indefensible.

        If you plan to reply to insult me, save it. Use that energy for something contructive like self-reflection, or showing empathy to someone who just got brutalized by police.