produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square619fedilinkarrow-up12.18Karrow-down177
arrow-up12.1Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square619fedilink
minus-squareChriskmee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoBecause the price you quoted wouldn’t be nearly enough if we built in expensive cities, it has to be built in cheap to build areas for that number to make sense.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYes. That’s reinvestment in rural areas. Eisenhower economics.
Because the price you quoted wouldn’t be nearly enough if we built in expensive cities, it has to be built in cheap to build areas for that number to make sense.
Yes. That’s reinvestment in rural areas. Eisenhower economics.