produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square619fedilinkarrow-up12.18Karrow-down177
arrow-up12.1Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square619fedilink
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoBanning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoWith or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoSo in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIt’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.
Banning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
With or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
So in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
It’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.