minimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Businesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square349fedilinkarrow-up12.68Karrow-down1165
arrow-up12.51Karrow-down1external-linkBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldminimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square349fedilink
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down3·2 年前Money is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
minus-squaremeteotsunami@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down4·2 年前Bold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·2 年前I mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.
minus-square🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前 money is speech, right? I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.
Money is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
Bold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
I mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.
I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.