This sounds like you were going to segue to today’s sponsor, Ground News.

Yeah, but we’re talking about an underfloor cooling system here. They don’t really have a way to distribute the cold air like air-conditioning systems do. So in the Olympic village’s case, a fan should be needed.

If the AC was set to 26 °C, you’re expecting the temp to be below 24 °C? What are you even talking about?

Why would having fans means it doesn’t work? I use fans along with AC to make the cold air distribution faster, doesn’t mean my AC is not working.

As in, trolling people to believe these things actually happen, I think.

There’s difficulty, then there’s balancing issue. We expect difficulty, but not invalidating certain builds entirely.

Doesn’t lemmy.ml always complain about their comments being deleted by lemmy.world? Sounds like most people care about this issue.

It’s not. You don’t have to play the K-Pop USB sticks, but you sure as hell can’t avoid smelling the shit NK drops on your house.

1. Robots presumably don’t have a need to be gendered, at least in most portrayal of robots I’ve seen.
2. The creator refered to it with a male pronouns, probably because their vision of the character have masculine features. That doesn’t necessarily mean the character itself is male gendered.

The answer to your second question is that ‘he’ was historically used as generic pronouns, though it’s not as acceptable nowadays.

Only NFTs died, so I guess part of crypto did.

Thanks to recessive genes, it’s definitely possible for two paint brushes to birth another form of brush.

So teams don’t use intermediates to avoid using up their soft tyre allocation. They should add some wiggle ground as the FIA can be slow at announcing things, but ultimately this is all on Ferrari.

There are lots of comments on that thread trying to divert the issue by pointing out the violence done by the western countries. I would assume his comment was in response to one of these comments, so he wouldn’t be the one to bring up the West into the discussion.

It seems the top one is from a Filipino movie called “My Ex and Whys”.

That tweet doesn’t mention the word disgusting at all.

And AMD is following along with the stupid naming scheme in the next generation.

Soury pungent smell.

He’s only offering a reason, not necessarily that he supports the reason. Are you guys so fragile in your beliefs that you can’t even handle a simple suggestion of a benefit to an opposing view?

A suggestion of a benefit to open-carrying does not equal endorsement, nor does it mean opposing the view that open-carrying can be dangerous. Try to be more open-minded.

If we all didn’t recommend Chrome, we would still be using IE now, probably.