railway692

Fascists don’t like sharing, even with other fascists.

OP’s post commentary is dropping religious pamphlets in inappropriate comms. Blocking.

It’s one of those “Would you press the button” questions.

You become cancer-free.

BUT

You turn into a dinosaur.

If you look at the point of an island and your first thought is ‘that’s a naked leg’, you have a leg kink.

No judgment.

But that’s what you are.

The problem with that, of course, is that one MIT study found that many enterprise organizations have so far seen zero return from their AI efforts.

Buyers are also changing, McKinsey believes. It says purchasing decisions are shifting from the IT department to line-of-business units. These leaders are increasingly making budget trade-offs between head count investment and AI deployment, and expect vendors to engage them on value and outcomes, not just features.

That could be a tricky sell, when trials of AI tools such as Microsoft’s Copilot by a UK government department reveal no discernible boost in productivity. Still, the AI firms have to recoup all those billions they’ve already invested somehow, don’t they?

They don’t. They don’t have to recoup those billions.

They can go bankrupt like businesses that create no value are supposed to.

What was the rationale for triple legs?

Were the flag designers secretly leg fetishists or were they out and proud?

Is there a good reason for not making them states already?

Oh, I understand now.

I thought the claim was “the weather made it unlikely that he smoked a cigarette”.

Investigators later ruled out cigarettes as a possible cause based on weather conditions at the time, according to the complaint.

‘It was too [insert weather here] for a cigarette’ sounds like bullshit.

I’m blocking you.

You should’ve been moderated already, for spamming the comm with stuff that has to be against Rule 1 (All posts must be shower thoughts).

This post is like finding a fake $20 in the parking lot that is actually a Jesus pamphlet.

Edit: Added pictures for context

Lmao. I got curious and looked through your user posts, too.

Howdy, internet neighbor!

Just to make this abundantly clear, we received a cease & desist against our use of the name ‘Revolt’, we are not releasing any further details as this may cause harassment of the other party and may hurt negotiations.

Damn, that sucks. I wonder who the whiny IP baby is.

I agree that it’s a skill, but I think the point is that it’s a skill with a very low ceiling compared to art.

Like being able to use a coffee machine.

But he did, though.

I thought that was the whole point of him bringing it up.

He said, we have tools (like magic lasso) that let you skip the boring part of art, so you can get to the creative part. AI can be like that; a tool that let’s you skip having to do backgrounds so you can focus on flying rat monstrosities.

He doesn’t use it that way, but he acknowledges that you can.

It’s just that most AI “art” usage is skipping putting in creative effort at all.

I feel like this is technically true, but in reality it only works like this in the void of space.

The energy I’m spending is to counter the molecule vibration transfer that’s being done (against my food’s will) by the sun and everything else in the space around my fridge.

I am ready for some physicist to pop out of the tall grass and explain how wrong I am.

This… does not seem like a shower thought.

That just sounds like normal news.

Not “I’m surprised this isn’t satire.”

The mistake is assuming this decision was based on anything resembling principles or values.

Why is this in nottheonion?