3·
11 hours agoNot to be a dick, but this reveals more about your own limitations than it does about the power of LLMs…
It just means you suck at prompting, which is basically just talking and explaining what you need
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: June 30th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I can’t believe I’m mentioning svelte kit file structure twice in like a week. I made an example to show in another comment but when I tried to copy and paste here it escaped Ann the characters, so here is a link
https://lemmy.zip/comment/21657580
Edit: I got it. The / at the end are not part of the name, they are just to show that they are folders
routes/ +page.ts (admin)/ +page.ts [user=uuid]/ [[community]]/ +page.ts posts/ [...postIds@]/ +page.ts
“mas o memos bien” by “El Mató a un Policía Motorizado”. It’s in Spanish, but the songs tells everyone (gf, friends, mother, even a stranger) that everything will be fine and not to worry and that goes " dad, I need money to make everything fine". Like wtf. Don’t go around promising solutions and then ask someone else to fix all your shit
Oh. No. You win. Mine is a gut feeling that modeling all routes with folders would become a paid. To navigate and manage, while you have actual experience
Im trying it out yet. It seems fun, the tutorial is amazing. I don’t think I’d want to do large enterprise projects with it
You fucked up common sense, which is worse.
I had autocorrect issues. What’s your excuse?
50cents looks like he’s rubbing his hands in a “I’m gonna fuck you” way with intense eye contact.
The other guy seems like his just praying and thinking “why am I dressed like an idiot?”
Don’t try svelte kit. This is pseudocode but it’s valid. The only symbol show here that is not real is the / that I’ve placed at the end of folder to show that they are folders. There are other special cases
routes/ +page.ts (admin)/ +page.ts [user=uuid]/ [[community]]/ +page.ts posts/ [...postIds@]/ +page.ts
Storing and serving 4/8k 60 fps video is extremely expensive. It’s not like twitter where you could run it of a phone if you wanted to.
Interesting. I’ve tried Jami. The experience was bad, but I didn’t try multi device. I’ll try when I get home
Which other e2ee decentralized apps have multi device without relaxing security?
Offtopic: there seems to be some issue with your comments. Any time you type “th” I get a “þ”
I did some quick googling and found this. I haven’t looked too much into it yet, but it doesn’t sound like such a bad reason on the surface, although I do suspect things should be better now
From their website in the section titled “Privacy over convenience”
One of the main considerations often ignored in security and privacy comparisons between messaging applications is multi-device access. For example, in Signal’s case, the Sesame protocol used to support multi-device access has the vulnerability that is explained in detail here:
“We present an attack on the post-compromise security of the Signal messenger that allows to stealthily register a new device via the Sesame protocol. […] This new device can send and receive messages without raising any ‘Bad encrypted message’ errors. Our attack thus shows that the Signal messenger does not guarantee post-compromise security at all in the multi-device setting”.
Solutions are possible, and even the quoted paper proposes improvements, but they are not implemented in any existing communication solutions. Unfortunately this results in most communication systems, even those in the privacy space, having compromised security in multi-device settings due to these limitations. That’s the reason we are not rushing a full multi-device support, and currently only provide the ability to use mobile app profiles via the desktop app, while they are on the same network.
The main Dev gave a talk somewhere sometime where he explained why doing multi device is a security risk. I always look for it and always lose the URL without watching it so I can’t explain more
Private and anonymous are different things. While anonymity does increase privacy, it is not a strict requirement. So it this private, but not as private as possible.
The best private messenger IMO is simplex, but it not production ready yet
It depends on the project. If you are making a code editor / ice then yes. Your project may not support working with assembly files. Sure, they are just plaintext (I think? Or are they binary? I think I might be confusing assembler source files and complied files which are machine code), but you get no tooling like autocomplete, go to definition, etc
I’m on the go right now. This is a quote for an old privacy guides snapshot, but when I was looking for it, I saw some articles from April saying that this was no longer true, so further searching needed when I get home