Jokes on you. I’m a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of ± 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!
I like this positive attitude!
It’s 87 degrees
No, no- it’s the design engineer who is clearly wrong.
Nah I blame the mathematicians
Full send
As long as it’s perfectly 89° it’s fine. That’s acute angle.
It’s very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.
It’s 87
Engineers: Eh, close enough.
shrugs Same order of magnitude
Is it exactly 89°?
No. It’s wrong, too. Have a nice day :)
I saw this before and if I remember correctly, it’s more like 87°.
No. It measures about 87°.
Wtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!
Wrong on purpose
I didn’t know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.
It’s noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.
Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.
More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?
I’ll see you in hell
deleted by creator
I can’t believe you’ve done this
That’s not right.
It’s still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.
90° isn’t any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.
So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.
Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.
You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!
