This is an open question on how to get the masses to care…

Unfortunately, if other people don’t protect their privacy it affects those who do, because we’re all connected (e.g. other family members, friends). So it presents a problem of how do you get people who don’t care, to care?

I started the Rebel Tech Alliance nonprofit to try to help with this, but we’re still really struggling to convert normies.

(BTW you might need to refresh our website a few times to get it to load - no idea why… It does have an SSL cert!)

So I hope we can have a useful discussion here - privacy is a team sport, how do we get normies to play?

    • whoareu@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I call them normies not because I look down upon them or I hate them I do that because whenever I educate them to use privacy oriented services they mock me saying “you are crazy” “you aren’t president” “nobody cares about your data” yada yada yada…

      It makes me frustrated :(

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Adult people talking like that lol

        🤡

        I generally tell them to put a ring camera in their bathroom and then see them get bent out of shape about they wouldn’t do that because…

      • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Framing “them” as fundamentally different reinforces the mental barrier that your requirements and their requirements are different. Avoid it.

  • Courant d'air 🍃@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Starting by not calling people that don’t know/care about privacy “normies”, and educating them I guess.

    Also I’d say start with the “easier” ones, for instance anti-capitalist people are more open to find ways to avoid surveillance capitalism. If enough of these people care and educate their respective circles, eventually all people will care.

    • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also I’d say start with the “easier” ones, for instance anti-capitalist people are more open to find ways to avoid surveillance capitalism. If enough of these people care and educate their respective circles, eventually all people will care.

      And pro-capitalism people should simply avoid being under surveillance of someone who can potentially help their competition with targetted info about them.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a feeling a whole bunch of people are about to start caring, when they see normal things being used as excuses to arrest friends, family, colleagues.

  • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think certain arguments work, and certain don’t.

    I live in a very high trust society, Norway. This has a lot of advantages, but also some downsides.

    We trust eachother, our neighbours, our government and our media. Which is fantastic, and well deserved. The government deserves the trust.

    This makes it hard for me to make people realize how important privacy is, because they trust organizations with their data.

    During COVID, Norway made their own app for tracking who met to prevent the spread. Of all the apps in the world, Norway wanted to push about the least privacy friendly app in the world. This from a country with the highest press freedom and rankings for democracy. Most people though it was fine, because why not? We trust our government.

    https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/norway-covid19-contact-tracing-app-privacy-win/

    Luckily someone protested enough, and it got scrapped for something better.

    When I try to convince someone I have a couple of angles:

    1. You trust the government and organizations with your data today. But do you trust the government in 30 years? Because data is forever. The US has changed a lot in a very short time, this can happen here as well

    2. You have a responsibility for other peoples privacy as well. When you use an app that gets access to all your SMSes and contacts you spy on behalf of companies on people that might need protection. Asylum seekers from other countries for instance.

  • hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s several overlapping problems:

    First, that the problem is complex. It’s not just “Microsoft bad.” There’s a turducken lasagna of layered problems that make it hard for the average person to wrap their heads around the issue.

    Next, there’s no direct monetary incentive. You can’t say “you lose $500 a year because data brokers know your address.” Most people also have relied their whole lives on free email, so the average person in already in “debt” in terms of trade offs already.

    You’re also starting from a point of blaming the victim in a way. It’s the same problem companies have with cybersecurity, blaming everyone except the executive that didn’t know the risks of skimping on cyber budgets. Hiding the problem to avoid public shame is the natural human response.

    Finally, that resolving the problem is fucking hard. I know, we all know, it’s a constantly moving target that requires at the very least moderate technical skill. My partner wants to have more privacy online, but would rather have conveniences in many cases. And has zero patience for keeping up with changes, so I have to be a CISO for a household. So the average person, and the average household, does not have the skillset to care “effectively” if they wanted to.

  • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    People want to use the sites and apps that the people they talk to are using. I’m on hexbear because the chapo reddit was banned, not because privacy or whatever. 99% of people will always choose “app that lets me talk to the people I want to and also spies on me” over “app that doesn’t do either of those.”

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    People want convinience. You’ll never get people to do it, unless it personally affects them. Realisticly, you can convert a few.

    But most importantly. It shouldnt be that hard to have privacy. THATS the problem. People shouldnt need to do alot of things to get it.

    Do something about the problem (political, legally change privacy laws) instead of every single person.

    But I know that can be near impossible depending of where you live.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do something about the problem (political, legally change privacy laws) instead of every single person.

      Anyone expecting the daddy state to help them here is out right delulu.

      Privacy is just one battle ground of the class war. Once we lose here, it is a wrap. We will exist in a fish bowl under ruling class with limited if any accountability.

      It seems most people are fine with it as of now. The longer critical mass keeps these cavalier attitudes about their personal freedom, the more likely we are all gonna get cooked.

      At some point, we will hit a point of no return.

      I guess some people are fine to be enslaved into a cycle of wage “labor” and consumption without any agency and autonomy.

  • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What moves people is stories of why you should care. Getting these stories highlighted and then providing the solution (or multiple solutions) is a sure way to call people to action.

    Devs and marketing then need to have an easy onboarding experience. But if people have a will they will find a way. Just don’t be an AH when they ask stupid questions.

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I can use an sdr to read your water meter and determine how often you go to the bathroom, shower, wash your clothes, and when you’re home and it’s not illegal. I’m allowed to follow you around and take your picture as much as I want to. I can print off as many pictures of you as I want in public and wallpaper my whole house with your face and body, there’s nothing you can do about it. I can do an 8 hour video essay about you and share this with everyone. As long as the info is publicly available (or not in most U.S. states), it’s legal.