Apple Music isn’t the best streaming music service — it’s just the least annoying::Competitors like Spotify and YouTube Music may be your first choice for music on Android, but you might want to reconsider

    • whs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I looked into that as I listened to my playlist most of the time. And then I realize nano.RIPE after 10 years still unable to be purchased outside iTunes Japan or Japanese speaking websites.

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Uhmm it’s pretty clear to me.

          He says that after 10 years “nano.RIPE” music still cannot be purchased outside Japan.

          I guess his point is that sadly that is not always a solution (outside piracy) as sometimes you cannot actually buy certain music, but I am guessing is actually available to be played on the streaming subscription service.

  • supersonicstork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everyone picks a streaming service for their needs. YT music has a large library bundled with ad free YT, Apple Music is a natural choice if you’re in the Apple ecosystem and Spotify exists too.

    I recently switched to Tidal from Spotify and haven’t looked back. The UI is familiar enough, having lossless is really nice, and not having my phone lag whenever I open my library is great.

    Then there’s the other factor of how much each streaming service pays it’s artists. To make 1000$ in revenue, this is how many streams an artist needs:

    YT Music : 500,000 ($0.002 per stream)

    Spotify : 314,465 ($0.00318 per stream)

    Apple : 125,000 ($0.008 per stream)

    Tidal : 77,882 ($0.01284 per stream)

    Granted, musicians almost never make their money from streaming services. However, if an artist were to have that 314k streams on Tidal instead of Spotify, they’d make 4 times as much money.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The number you pulled for YouTube Music is based on free users watching YouTube videos. YouTube Music streams from paying subscribers are 4x that at $0.08 per stream.

      The Spotify number is also averaged across free and premium users - I’m not sure the number for premium users only but it is likely closer to what Apple and Tidal pay since those are premium-only.

      The other problem though is that none of the services have implemented user-centric payments. So your money on any of the services is going to Taylor Swift, Drake and Bad Bunny no matter who you listen to because everyone gets paid based on their percentage of the total streams.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t apple overwrite people’s music with different versions of their songs or something?

    Regardless, fuck Apple. I’m happy with Jellyfin.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yepp - all my bootleg and vinyl rips was suddenly replaced with other versions. Even some of my ripped albums ended up as songs from different albums.

      Only reason I still have the Apple Music app is because when I connect my phone in my car with usb, the stereo will give errors if it’s not there. Also starts auto playing when connected even if tidal is playing while connection is made.

    • ky56@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. It has screwed up album art and as a very visual person it has really fucked my ability to browse through my library. Also the older the album/song was added, the more broken tracks there are.

      As a result I am now working to switch away from Apple Music and streaming in general. I was perfectly happy paying the student price for Apple Music. However with it increasingly breaking my library and needing me to conduct “library maintenance” to keep up with their licensing issues. Well fuck that.

  • PlexSheep@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The best streaming service is my selfhosted Jellyfin. I serve me no ads and I’m 100% sure I don’t do any shady business with my data.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, InnerTune is the best. Has the library of YouTube music, no ads, free, can download songs as actual files (at least in a previous version, which is still available on F-Droid archive)

  • sky@codesink.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I switched to Android a few months ago and expected to want to switch away from Apple Music, but their Android app is excellent. Plus they have lossless quality. Oh, and you can upload your own music to their cloud for streaming anywhere.

  • ky56@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My Apple Music vs Spotify argument is Spotify is a shitty excuse electron app that hogs compute and battery on my mac laptop. Compare that to even iTunes and it was an easy choice.